Ding, N. & Vancleef, K. (2022). Test-retest reliability and Practice Effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test. Behavior Research Methods.

Vancleef, K., Demeyere, N., Sun, L. (2021). Shortening the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test with Item Response Theory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Psychological Assessment, 10.1037/pas0001045.

Colwell, M. J., Demeyere, N., Vancleef, K. (2021). Visual Perceptual Deficit Screening in Stroke Survivors: Evaluation of Current Practice in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. Disability and Rehabilitation, 1–13.

Moore, M., Vancleef, K., Riddoch, J., Gillebert, C., Demeyere, N. (2021). Recovery of Visuospatial Neglect Subtypes and Relationship to Functional Outcome Six Months After Stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 35(9), 823-835.

Ben Itzhak, N., Vancleef, K., Franki, I., Laenen, A., Wagemans, J., Ortibus, E. (2021). Quantifying visuoperceptual profiles of children with cerebral visual impairment. Child Neuropsychology, 27(8), 995-1023.

Vancleef, K., Colwell, M. J., Hewitt, O., Demeyere, N. (2020). Current practice and challenges in screening for visual perception deficits after stroke: a qualitative study. Disability and Rehabilitation.

McCaslin, A., Vancleef, K., Hubert, L., Read, J. C. A, & Port, N. (2020). Stereotest Comparison: Efficacy, Reliability, and Variability of a New Glasses-Free Stereotest Translational Vision Science & Technology. 9, 29.

Serrano-Pedraza, I., Vancleef, K., Herbert, W., Goodship, N., Woodhouse, M, Read, J. C. A. (2020). Efficient estimation of stereo thresholds: what slope should be assumed for the psychometric function? PLoS ONE. 15(1):e0226822.

Vancleef, K., Janssens, E., Petré, Y., Wagemans, J., & Ortibus, E. (2020). Assessment tool for visual perception deficits in cerebral visual impairment: Reliability and validity. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 62(1), 118-124.

Vancleef, K., Janssens, E., Petré, Y., Wagemans, J., & Ortibus, E. (2020). Assessment tool for visual perception deficits in Cerebral Visual Impairment (CVIT 3-6): Development and normative data of typically-developing children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. 62(1), 111-117.

Casanova, T., Black, C., Rafiq, S., Hugill-Jones, T., Read, J, C. A., & Vancleef, K. (2020) The impact of active research involvement of young children in the design of a new stereotest. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(29).

Ben Itzhak, N., Vancleef, K., Franki, I., Laenen, A., Wagemans, J., & Ortibus, E. (2019). Visuoperceptual profiles of children with Cerebral Visual Impairment based on the Flemish CVI questionnaire. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. Online first.

Read, J. C. A., Rafiq, S., Hugill, J. A., Casanova, T., Black, C., O’Neill, A., Puyat, V., Haggerty, H., Smart, K., Powell, C., Taylor, K., Clarke, M., & Vancleef. K. (2019) Characterizing the Randot Preschool Stereotest: testability, norms, reliability, specificity and sensitivity in children aged 2-11 years. PLoS ONE 14(11): e0224402.

Demeyere, N., Sun, S., Milosevich, E., Vancleef, K. (2019). Post-stroke cognition with the Oxford Cognitive Screen vs Montreal Cognitive Assessment: a multi-site randomized controlled study (OCS-CARE). [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. AMRC Open Res 2019, 1-12.

Vancleef, K. & Read, J. C. A. (2019). Which Stereotest Do You Use? A Survey Research Study in the British Isles, the United States and Canada. British and Irish Orthoptic Journal, 15(1): 15-24.

Moore, M. J., Vancleef, K., Shalev, N., Husain, M., & Demeyere, N. (2019) When Neglect Is Neglected: NIHSS observational measure lacks sensitivity in identifying post-stroke unilateral neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 90, 1070-1071.

Vancleef, K., Serrano-Pedraza, I. Sharp, C., Slack, G., Black, C., Casanova, T., Hugill, J., Rafiq, S., Burridge, J., Puyat, V., Ewane Enongue, J., Akotei, H., Collier. Z., Haggerty, H., Smart, K., Powell, C., Taylor, K., Clarke, M. P., Morgan, G., Read, J. C. A. (2019). ASTEROID: A new clinical stereotest on an autostereo 3D tablet. Translational Vision Science and Technology, 8(1): 25.

Vancleef, K., Read, J. C. A., Herbert, W., Goodship, N., Woodhouse. M., & Serrano-Pedraza I. (2018). Two choices good, four choices better: For measuring stereoacuity in children, a four-alternative forced-choice paradigm is more efficient than two. PLoS ONE, 13(7): e0201366.

Elliott, A. & Vancleef, K. (2018). Latest research in amblyopia treatment. Optician, 257, 26-27.

Vancleef, K. & Read, J. C. A. (2017). Measuring near stereopsis. Optician, 254, 26-31.

Sharp, C., Ushaw, G., Hugill, J., Rafiq, S., Black, C., Casanova, T., Vancleef, K., Read, J. C. A., & Morgan G. (2017).  Analysis of soft data for mass provision of stereoacuity testing through a serious game for health. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Digital Health, 216-220.

Vancleef, K., Read, J. C. A., Herbert, W., Goodship, N., Woodhouse. M., & Serrano-Pedraza I. (2017). Overestimation of stereo thresholds by the TNO stereotest is not due to global stereopsis. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 37(4), 507-520.

Serrano-Pedraza, I., Vancleef K., & Read J. (2017). Avoiding monocular artefacts in clinical stereo tests presented on column-interleaved digital stereoscopic displays. Journal of Vision, 16(14), 13.

Vancleef, K., Meesen, R., Swinnen, S., & Fujiyama, H. (2016). Does motor learning in a bimanual coordination task improve after tDCS stimulation? Scientific Reports, 6, 35739.

Serrano-Pedraza, I., Herbert, W., Villa-Laso, L., Widdall, M., Vancleef, K., & Read, J. C. A. (2016). The stereoscopic anisotropy develops during childhood. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 57(3), 960-970.

Pauwels, L., Vancleef, K., Swinnen, S. P., & Beets, I. A. M. (2015). Challenge to promote change: both young and older adults benefit from contextual interference. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 7, 157.

Schmidt, F., & Vancleef, K. (2015). Response priming evidence for feedforward processing of snake contours but not of ladder contours and textures. Vision Research, 126, 174-182.

Vancleef, K., Acke, E., Torfs, K., Demeyer, N., Lafosse, C., Humphreys, G. W., Wagemans, J., & de-Wit, L. (2014). Reliability and Validity of the Leuven Perceptual Organization Screening Test (L-POST). Journal of Neuropsychology, 9(2), 271-298.

Vancleef, K. & Wagemans, J. (2014). Component processes in contour integration: A direct comparison between snakes and ladders in a detection and a shape discrimination task. Vision Research, 92, 39-46.

Torfs, K.*, Vancleef, K.*, Lafosse, C., Wagemans, J., & de-Wit, L. (2014). The Leuven Perceptual Organization Screening Test (L-POST), an online test to assess mid-level perception. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 472–487. (* joint first authors)

Vancleef, K., Wagemans, J., & Humphreys, G. (2013). Impaired texture segregation but spared contour integration following damage to right posterior parietal cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 230(1), 41-57.

Vancleef, K., Putzeys, T., Gheorghiu, E., Sassi, M., Machilsen, B., & Wagemans, J. (2013). Spatial arrangement in texture discrimination and texture segregation. i-Perception, 4, 36-52.

Machilsen, B., Novitski, N., Vancleef, K., & Wagemans, J. (2011). Context modulates the ERP signature of contour integration. PLoS One, 6 (9), e25151, 1-7.

Vangeneugden, J., Vancleef, K., Jaeggli, T., Van Gool, L., & Vogels, R. (2010). Discrimination of locomotion direction in impoverished displays of walkers by macaque monkeys. Journal of Vision, 10 (4), 22.1-22.19.

Sassi, M., Vancleef, K., Machilsen, B., Panis, S., & Wagemans, J. (2010). Identification of everyday objects on the basis of Gaborized outline versions. i-Perception, 1, 121-142.

Van Laere, K., Wagemans, J., Vancleef, K., Dirix, S., Van de Cruys, S., Amand, F., Koole, M., Vanderginste, D., Steukers, M., Porters, K., & Goffin, K. (2010). Cross-over study “Art and creativity”: Is there an underlying neurobiological basis? In: Doove E. (Eds.), Cahiers of IvOK: Parallelepiped book (pp. 137-143). Leuven: Acco.