Publications

Vancleef, K., Demeyere, N., Sun, L. (2021). Shortening the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test with Item Response Theory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Psychological assessment, 10.1037/pas0001045. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001045

Colwell, M. J., Demeyere, N., Vancleef, K.(2021). Visual Perceptual Deficit Screening in Stroke Survivors: Evaluation of Current Practice in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. Disability and rehabilitation, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1970246

Moore, M., Vancleef, K., Riddoch, J., Gillebert, C., Demeyere, N. (2021). Recovery of Visuospatial Neglect Subtypes and Relationship to Functional Outcome Six Months After Stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 35(9), 823-835. https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683211032977

Ben Itzhak, N., Vancleef, K., Franki, I., Laenen, A., Wagemans, J., Ortibus, E. (2021). Quantifying visuoperceptual profiles of children with cerebral visual impairment. Child Neuropsychology, 27(8), 995-1023. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2021.1915265

Ding, N. & Vancleef, K. (preprint). Test-retest reliability and Practice Effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test. PsyArXiv: 10.31234/osf.io/24sjt

Vancleef, K., Colwell, M. J., Hewitt, O., Demeyere, N. (2020). Current practice and challenges in screening for visual perception deficits after stroke: a qualitative study. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1824245

McCaslin, A., Vancleef, K., Hubert, L., Read, J. C. A, & Port, N. (2020). Stereotest Comparison: Efficacy, Reliability, and Variability of a New Glasses-Free Stereotest Translational Vision Science & Technology. 9, 29. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.9.29

Serrano-Pedraza, I., Vancleef, K., Herbert, W., Goodship, N., Woodhouse, M, Read, J. C. A. (2020). Efficient estimation of stereo thresholds: what slope should be assumed for the psychometric function? PLoS ONE. 15(1):e0226822. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226822

Vancleef, K., Janssens, E., Petré, Y., Wagemans, J., & Ortibus, E. (2020). Assessment tool for visual perception deficits in cerebral visual impairment: Reliability and validity. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 62(1), 118-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14304

Vancleef, K., Janssens, E., Petré, Y., Wagemans, J., & Ortibus, E. (2020). Assessment tool for visual perception deficits in Cerebral Visual Impairment (CVIT 3-6): Development and normative data of typically-developing children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. 62(1), 111-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14303

Ben Itzhak, N., Vancleef, K., Franki, I., Laenen, A., Wagemans, J., & Ortibus, E. (2019). Visuoperceptual profiles of children with Cerebral Visual Impairment based on the Flemish CVI questionnaire. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. Online first. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14448

Read, J. C. A., Rafiq, S., Hugill, J. A., Casanova, T., Black, C., O’Neill, A., Puyat, V., Haggerty, H., Smart, K., Powell, C., Taylor, K., Clarke, M., & Vancleef. K. (2019) Characterizing the Randot Preschool Stereotest: testability, norms, reliability, specificity and sensitivity in children aged 2-11 years. PLoS ONE 14(11): e0224402. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224402

Demeyere, N., Sun, S., Milosevich, E., Vancleef, K. (2019). Post-stroke cognition with the Oxford Cognitive Screen vs Montreal Cognitive Assessment: a multi-site randomized controlled study (OCS-CARE). [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. AMRC Open Res 2019, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.12688/amrcopenres.12882.1

Vancleef, K. & Read, J. C. A. (2019). Which Stereotest Do You Use? A Survey Research Study in the British Isles, the United States and Canada. British and Irish Orthoptic Journal, 15(1): 15-24. http://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.120

Moore, M. J., Vancleef, K., Shalev, N., Husain, M., & Demeyere, N. (2019) When Neglect Is Neglected: NIHSS observational measure lacks sensitivity in identifying post-stroke unilateral neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 90, 1070-1071. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2018-319668

Vancleef, K., Serrano-Pedraza, I. Sharp, C., Slack, G., Black, C., Casanova, T., Hugill, J., Rafiq, S., Burridge, J., Puyat, V., Ewane Enongue, J., Akotei, H., Collier. Z., Haggerty, H., Smart, K., Powell, C., Taylor, K., Clarke, M. P., Morgan, G., Read, J. C. A. (2019). ASTEROID: A new clinical stereotest on an autostereo 3D tablet. Translational Vision Science and Technology, 8(1): 25. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.1.25

Vancleef, K., Read, J. C. A., Herbert, W., Goodship, N., Woodhouse. M., & Serrano-Pedraza I. (2018). Two choices good, four choices better: For measuring stereoacuity in children, a four-alternative forced-choice paradigm is more efficient than two. PLoS ONE, 13(7): e0201366. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201366

Elliott, A. & Vancleef, K. (2018). Latest research in amblyopia treatment. Optician, 257, 26-27.

Vancleef, K. & Read, J. C. A. (2017). Measuring near stereopsis. Optician, 254, 26-31.

Sharp, C., Ushaw, G., Hugill, J., Rafiq, S., Black, C., Casanova, T., Vancleef, K., Read, J. C. A., & Morgan G. (2017).  Analysis of soft data for mass provision of stereoacuity testing through a serious game for health. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Digital Health, 216-220. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3079452.3079496

Vancleef, K., Read, J. C. A., Herbert, W., Goodship, N., Woodhouse. M., & Serrano-Pedraza I. (2017). Overestimation of stereo thresholds by the TNO stereotest is not due to global stereopsis. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 37(4), 507-520. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12371

Serrano-Pedraza, I., Vancleef K., & Read J. (2017). Avoiding monocular artefacts in clinical stereo tests presented on column-interleaved digital stereoscopic displays. Journal of Vision, 16(14), 13. https://doi.org/10.1167/16.14.13

Vancleef, K., Meesen, R., Swinnen, S., & Fujiyama, H. (2016). Does motor learning in a bimanual coordination task improve after tDCS stimulation? Scientific Reports, 6, 35739. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep35739

Serrano-Pedraza, I., Herbert, W., Villa-Laso, L., Widdall, M., Vancleef, K., & Read, J. C. A. (2016). The stereoscopic anisotropy develops during childhood. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 57(3), 960-970. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-17766

Pauwels, L., Vancleef, K., Swinnen, S. P., & Beets, I. A. M. (2015). Challenge to promote change: both young and older adults benefit from contextual interference. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 7, 157. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00157

Schmidt, F., & Vancleef, K. (2015). Response priming evidence for feedforward processing of snake contours but not of ladder contours and textures. Vision Research, 126, 174-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2015.03.002

Vancleef, K., Acke, E., Torfs, K., Demeyer, N., Lafosse, C., Humphreys, G. W., Wagemans, J., & de-Wit, L. (2014). Reliability and Validity of the Leuven Perceptual Organization Screening Test (L-POST). Journal of Neuropsychology, 9(2), 271-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12050

Vancleef, K. & Wagemans, J. (2014). Component processes in contour integration: A direct comparison between snakes and ladders in a detection and a shape discrimination task. Vision Research, 92, 39-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.09.003

Torfs, K.*, Vancleef, K.*, Lafosse, C., Wagemans, J., & de-Wit, L. (2014). The Leuven Perceptual Organization Screening Test (L-POST), an online test to assess mid-level perception. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 472–487. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0382-6 (* joint first authors)

Vancleef, K., Wagemans, J., & Humphreys, G. (2013). Impaired texture segregation but spared contour integration following damage to right posterior parietal cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 230(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3629-7

Vancleef, K., Putzeys, T., Gheorghiu, E., Sassi, M., Machilsen, B., & Wagemans, J. (2013). Spatial arrangement in texture discrimination and texture segregation. i-Perception, 4, 36-52. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0515

Machilsen, B., Novitski, N., Vancleef, K., & Wagemans, J. (2011). Context modulates the ERP signature of contour integration. PLoS One, 6 (9), e25151, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025151

Vangeneugden, J., Vancleef, K., Jaeggli, T., Van Gool, L., & Vogels, R. (2010). Discrimination of locomotion direction in impoverished displays of walkers by macaque monkeys. Journal of Vision, 10 (4), 22.1-22.19. https://doi.org/10.1167/10.4.22

Sassi, M., Vancleef, K., Machilsen, B., Panis, S., & Wagemans, J. (2010). Identification of everyday objects on the basis of Gaborized outline versions. i-Perception, 1, 121-142. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0384

Van Laere, K., Wagemans, J., Vancleef, K., Dirix, S., Van de Cruys, S., Amand, F., Koole, M., Vanderginste, D., Steukers, M., Porters, K., & Goffin, K. (2010). Cross-over study “Art and creativity”: Is there an underlying neurobiological basis? In: Doove E. (Eds.), Cahiers of IvOK: Parallelepiped book (pp. 137-143). Leuven: Acco.